The Syrian case
The Syrian case represents a major challenge for the OPCW, particularly because of the recurrent use of chemical weapons during the conflict that has been going on since 2011. Syria, a signatory state to the CWC since 2013, has been repeatedly accused of using chemical weapons against its own population. The outlook for the OPCW in this context is as follows:
- The role of the OPCW in Syria: In 2013, after an alleged chemical attack in Eastern Ghouta, Syria signed the Chemical Weapons Convention and agreed to destroy its chemical arsenal. The OPCW, in collaboration with the United Nations (UN), oversaw this destruction. However, the international community has identified possible gaps and irregularities in the declaration of chemical stockpiles.
- On 29 April 2014, the Director General of the OPCW set up a Syrian Declaration Assessment Team (the DAT: Déclaration Assessment Team [1] ), which is a multidisciplinary team made up of experts from the OPCW Technical Secretariat. The DAT’s mandate is to verify the accuracy and completeness of the declarations submitted by the Syrian Arab Republic. The DAT exchanges with the competent authorities of the Syrian Arab Republic on the gaps, inconsistencies and discrepancies identified by the Technical Secretariat in Syria’s initial declaration (2013) regarding its chemical weapons programme. The TSF regularly reports to OPCW Member States and other international bodies. Nevertheless, regular allegations of chemical weapons use have persisted, particularly in 2017 and 2018.
- The OPCW also acquired another capability on the same 29 April 2014, by creating the OPCW Fact-Finding Mission (FFM : Fact-Finding Mission [2]), which is responsible for determining whether toxic chemicals were used as weapons in the Syrian Arab Republic. Its mandate does not include identifying those responsible for the alleged attacks.
- On the basis of the FFM’s findings, it is the OPCW’s Investigation and Identification Team (IIT : Investigation and Identification Team [3]), established on 27 June 2018, which is collecting and analysing evidence that could help identify the perpetrators of the chemical weapons attacks in Syria (as the OPCW-UN Joint Investigative Mechanism (JIM) previously did).
- The OPCW’s limitations in the face of accusations and violations : One of the OPCW’s major challenges in the Syrian context lies in the repeated accusations of the use of chemical weapons by Bashar al-Assad’s regime. Although the OPCW has confirmed certain chemical attacks (such as the Khan Sheikhoun attack in 2017), limited access to certain areas, the Syrian government’s opposition to certain inspections, and geopolitical complexity make investigations difficult. The OPCW faces considerable political obstacles, notably because of the Russian veto in the UN Security Council, which protects the Syrian regime.